(Site under intermittent construction. Changes may appear randomly at any time.)

A word or two about this Blog site:

I've resisted creating my own place here in cyberspace for some time. There are many brilliant, articulate people writing about what's going on in public education. Mountains of data and knowledge that expose the "education reform" movement as neither can be found all over the internet. I highly recommend you check out dianeravitch.com or curmudgucation.blogspot.com, for starters.

I would like to use this site as a way to rant a little and to pose my own questions, as issues in my daily teaching life impel me to rant and I do like to ask questions. And my friends and family may have grown weary of me filling their inboxes. I also like to muse about possible answers, and hope I will be heard in cyberspace by at least a few interested readers.

Having said that, I seek communication in writing that moves the conversation forward, even towards actionable results. I know I can't control writers I've never met and never will meet, but if you choose to comment, I encourage you to help us understand your point of view. Snark is welcomed. Rudeness is not.

Thanks for reading!

Tuesday, February 16, 2016

ACTION #1

Action #1: Letter writing to Congressman Chaffetz and other members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
Timing for greatest impact:  February 20-27

Action:
I have long been feeling the need for some kind of on-going, unified action that we as teachers, parents, and concerned citizens can do to get our message out.  The message is a counter-narrative to the damaging, but wildly successful message of "education reform" that the corporate philanthropists and politicians of all stripes have written.  The tipping point for me was when I viewed the proceedings of the February 2nd Congressional hearing on questionable behavior by the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Education. (See background information below.) While it's still unclear to me if Dr. Harris is at fault for serious allegations, or if he's a fall guy of some sort, what is abundantly clear is that something is terribly wrong at the DoE. And with John King now leading that department, I am more than EXTREMELY concerned.  (And I'm a New Yorker with personal experience with his damaging "leadership.")

I am positive there are many, many substantive issues upon which Mr. Chaffetz, Chair of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and I disagree.   But I think he’s Chairing an investigation worth supporting at this time.  There is much that could be learned from further questioning.  The hearings to this point in time seem to raise more questions than have been answered.
These hearings demand a response from the public.  (See background information below, if you’re unfamiliar with the issues.)  We have to let both the Congressmen and women know we are watching and we are concerned.  We need to let them know there are more questions that should be asked and more concerns about the Department of Education that should be investigated.

I believe a worthwhile first letter-writing action should include the following:
·      
    Contacting Congressman Chaffetz to both thank him for leading an investigation into the Department of Education’s CIO, and encourage him to continue investigating how the Department functions.  (It has one of the worst “job satisfaction” ratings in the entire government, which has to mean something.)
·      Encourage further questioning of Secretary King which could help illuminate what exactly he believes is in the best interest of American school children and teachers.
·      Support further questioning/investigating by the other Congressmen and Congresswomen who sit on the Committee.

What questions do you think should be asked?  Please send me your thoughts and I will formulate a sample letter to share.  Or write your own letter. 

Below you will find contact information for the various Congress people who participated in the hearings.   In order to write them, you have to insert an address and zip code from their district. I used a street address close to their office and that seemed to work.  (Not sure how this will be received, but I added a P.S. to my letter apologizing for my minor deception...)
Alternatively, you can write your own representative, even if they’re not on the Committee, to share your concerns.

·      Mr. Chaffetz (Chair of the Committee-Utah-R) https://chaffetzforms.house.gov/contact/
·      Congresswoman Norton:  (DC-D)   https://norton.house.gov/contact/email

·      Mr. Wahlberg (Michigan-R) http://walberg.house.gov/contact/

Mr. Lieu (California-D)   https://lieu.house.gov/contact

·      Mr. Mulvaney- (SC-R)   https://mulvaney.house.gov/contact/email

·       Mr. Hurd - (Texas - R)   https://hurd.house.gov/contact

·      Mr. Meadows - (NC-R)  https://meadows.house.gov/contact/email-me
·      Ms. Plaskett (Virgin Islands) She is OUTSTANDING!!  “The panel is how the truth is uncovered. “ https://plaskett.house.gov/contact
·       

From this hearing it seems abundantly clear what is wrong at the DoE - cover-up, lack of accountability, lack of questioning, lack of follow-through, turning a blind eye, and now John King is heading this agency????

PLEASE WRITE/CALL and share your concerns about how the Department of Education is being run in general, and about John King leading the department, in particular.

Background:

In February, the U.S. House Oversight and Government Reform Committee held a Hearing entitled: “U.S. Department of Education: Investigation of the CIO.”  The goal was to further investigate allegations against the Chief Information Officer, Danny Harris regarding security of millions of American’s personal information and possible conflicts of interest in his personal life.  You can see details from the first hearing from November 17, 2015 here.

And you can see details of the February  2nd hearing here.

The February hearing at least, is actually noteworthy tv/internet viewing, appearing somewhere between a docu-drama and tragicomedy.  I set out to view 10 minutes to get the gist of the issues, but nearly three hours later, I realized I’d sat through the entire proceedings.  And while the issues of security breaches and unofficial side-jobs and ethical questions of how a person at the head of a major government department can engage in even remotely questionable behavior, and the very real concerns about cyber security exposed by a controlled breach of the information system (that contains millions of Americans’ personal information,) what I found most riveting was the testimony of John King, acting Commissioner of Education. 

Those of you from New York State know him as the leader of the recent “education reform” in our state.  Those measures included an ill-advised rush to implement unproven new standards, and the even more damaging implementation of unproven, untested, and developmentally inappropriate new assessments to determine teaching and learning effectiveness for all teachers and students in New York State, grades 3 – 8.  He left a wake of disruption and destruction in our schools which led to, among other things, a 20% Opt Out rate last Spring and Governor Cuomo reversing his own public position to say he believes the implementation of the new standards was “deeply flawed,” and he urged a full “re-boot” of the process.  That deeply flawed process was the brainchild of none other than John King, the current acting Secretary of Education of the United States, (and soon-to-be approved Secretary?)  He was recruited by President Obama last spring to replace out-going Secretary of Education, Arne Duncan. 

John King is now THE leading educator in the United States of America.  From his own testimony at the hearing he states:

I firmly believe that providing our children with a great education is not just about subject matter knowledge, but also about instilling the values that will help them become faithful contributors to our communities and democracy. That is why throughout my career in public service I have always expected myself, then my students, and later, my colleagues and employees, to adhere to the highest standards of ethical conduct, and I will continue to expect the same of the Department under my leadership in the year to come.”

What he says and what he's saying do not actually match, though.  
I believe the most interesting (and unsettling) part of the Congressional hearing on February 2nd is John King’s testimony.  He so clearly demonstrates exactly how dangerous he can be as a leader of anything. His style of unwaivering adherence to his internal script (which contains no real answers) in the face of pointed questioning by many members of Congress, is exposed.  Congressman Chaffetz’s, Chair of the Committee, frustration is palpable.  Mr. King neither responds directly to most questions posed, nor does he raise his voice, get ruffled, nor goes off-script.  He doesn’t answer the questions posed to him, and he doesn’t appear to see any conflict nor issue with his responses.  The man in charge of the path an entire nation’s school children is clearly someone to question further and to wonder about.
How can you claim that your goal is to instill values in children so they can become faithful contributors to our democracy, yet remain ignorant of or dismissive of or just plain indifferent to the enormous negative impact of his decision-making?
We must share our extreme concerns (shock? dismay? outrage?) about John King leading the Department of Education. New Yorkers know first-hand the damage he can cause.  And he makes no apologies, sees no conflicts, and allows for absolutely no differences of opinion.  He is a man blindly (absurdly?) dedicated to his own agenda.  And that agenda harms kids.  Period.
Sample letter to be posted soon…
But you can write your own right now!  :-)



No comments:

Post a Comment