(Site under intermittent construction. Changes may appear randomly at any time.)

A word or two about this Blog site:

I've resisted creating my own place here in cyberspace for some time. There are many brilliant, articulate people writing about what's going on in public education. Mountains of data and knowledge that expose the "education reform" movement as neither can be found all over the internet. I highly recommend you check out dianeravitch.com or curmudgucation.blogspot.com, for starters.

I would like to use this site as a way to rant a little and to pose my own questions, as issues in my daily teaching life impel me to rant and I do like to ask questions. And my friends and family may have grown weary of me filling their inboxes. I also like to muse about possible answers, and hope I will be heard in cyberspace by at least a few interested readers.

Having said that, I seek communication in writing that moves the conversation forward, even towards actionable results. I know I can't control writers I've never met and never will meet, but if you choose to comment, I encourage you to help us understand your point of view. Snark is welcomed. Rudeness is not.

Thanks for reading!

Sunday, February 28, 2016

SCHOOL RECEIVERSHIP AND THE ACLU

I read on Diane Ravitch's blog this morning about the issue of Charters in Hoboken attracting the attention of the ACLU.


I’m curious to see how this plays out in Hoboken. A district in a nearby small city is in receivership and I didn’t hear about it until I attended a forum sponsored by NYSAPE. I haven’t seen it in the local news, and I certainly haven’t heard anything from NYSUT (state level union in NYS.)
The district has the largest minority student body in the area by far and it’s the only district in the area that’s in receivership. The first thing that struck me was that there had to be a civil rights angle. I contacted the ACLU but they declined to get involved, as they had other actions they were pursuing in the area.
I know the ACLU had more than enough work to do. And I’m not faulting them. But I can’t think of any more pressing civil rights issues in our day than those that impact the ability of children to get a free, appropriate education that actually prepares them to become citizens in a democracy. Nothing about the receivership process is indicating improvement and progress towards that end.
So I wonder, once again, where is the public outcry? The moral indignation?
I worry about the deafening silence that, intentional or not, implies acceptance or even complicity.

No comments:

Post a Comment